All papers submitted to IC-EISIT will be reviewed by 2-3 expert reviewers from the conference committees. After a careful reviewing process, all accepted papers will be published by SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering (ISSN: 0277-786X) in the conference proceedings, and  submitted for indexing in EI Compendex, Scopus and other databases.​

 

​

​

​​​​​

Publication Ethics Statement

The 2026 International Conference on Electrical, Intelligent Systems and Information Technology (IC-EISIT 2026) follows the highest standards of publication ethics and takes all possible procedures against any publication misconduct. This Conference is committed to maintaining high standards through a rigorous peer-review together with strict ethical policies. Any infringements of professional ethical codes, such as plagiarism, fraudulent use of data, bogus claims of authorship, should be taken very seriously by the editors with zero tolerance.

The submitted manuscript should not have been previously published in any form and must not be currently under consideration for publication elsewhere.

 

Editorial Policy

The papers will be reviewed by at least 2-3 reviewers, but usually by more to review the papers’ relevance, originality, technical quality, significance and presentation.

​

The reviewer should account for their reviewing decision by providing the sufficient, substantial and well-founded comments that may help the authors to optimize the paper. In addition, the reviewer is also probably asked to answer a series of questions by the program committee. After receiving the review comments, the authors are entitled to the rebuttal and its’ feedback. But the final review decision will not be changed in virtue of that.

 

Pre-review check

In this process, the editor will have a quick look at the manuscript and evaluate the overall impression of it such as relevance to the conference scope, originality of paper, language, layout, artwork quality and paper length.

​

Peer Review Policy

Double-blind. The authors and reviewers are not aware of the identities of both sides.

​

Criteria

• Originality: The paper should be original, offer novel ideas or achieve advances in the specific research areas.

• Relevance to the conference: The research of the accepted paper should be relevant to the conference and important to the research field.

• Significance: The paper should contain valid analysis and solid experiment design, and should make a sufficient impact on the research field covered.

• Quality of Presentation: The quality of English language usage and grammar should be appropriate and easy to read. The presentation of the paper should be well balanced and presented in a logical order.